Skip to main content

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows

Directed by: Guy Ritchie
Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, and Noomi Rapace
Screenplay by: Michele Mulroney and Kieran Mulroney

    The ultimate detective duo is back, and this time, they're playing a dangerous game affecting all of Europe.
    It's 1891 and France and Germany are on the brink of war.  Bombs are going off periodically throughout the two countries.  So, it's up to Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson to figure out what's really going on, and prevent a mad professor from starting a disastrous war.
    As with the first Sherlock Holmes film in the current series (2009), clues are everywhere, even in places we wouldn't expect them to be.  This long and convoluted story, involves many characters (some not even essential to the story yet are main characters), and is not exactly told in a coherent fashion.  It's easy to get lost.  There is so much information about the case given in each scene, that sometimes the film may march on while we are still processing the facts so far.  Yet with such a convoluted story in which elements that make it make sense could easily get lost, not one mystery goes unsolved, not one clue goes unfound.  Everything is clearly explained, even if the film is too fast paced for us to realize it.  The advantage to this style of storytelling is that it is virtually impossible to predict what will happen next.  My only problem with it is that the suspect is way too obvious.
    Also as with the first film, many of the action sequences are presented in Holmes's mind first and carefully explained with intricate detail in slow motion, then presented again in real time.  It gives us an idea of Holmes's strange way of thinking about the case.  While the action sequences in the film are exciting because they are shot half in slow motion, half in real time, they aren't really necessary.  But I will admit, they're really cool.  And if you're wondering just how many there are, all I can say is that there are far fewer than in the first film.
     It's hard to say whether this film is better than the first one because they are quite similar.  They both include complex plots, but the difference between the two is A Game of Shadows is faster paced and contains a denser plot.  If you blink, you'll miss something and it will be more confusing from that point forward.  However, for those of you who want to know if you need to see the first movie before seeing A Game of Shadows, the answer is no.  The two stories have nothing to do with each other.  However, I would recommend seeing the first movie before seeing A Game of Shadows only because you will get a better perspective of each of the characters, especially Sherlock Holmes.
The best clue I can give you is my grade for the film; B+.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Hunger Games

Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, and Liam Hemsworth Directed by: Gary Ross Screenplay by: Gary Ross and Suzanne Collins Based on the novel by Suzanne Collins      If reality television hasn't gone too far yet, then this show should definitely make it go too far.      In a futuristic nation called Panem, one boy and one girl are selected from each of the nation's twelve districts to represent them in an annual television event called the Hunger Games.  Of the 24 contestants, only one will survive in this televised fight to the death.      I like the concept of the story.  While this futuristic society seems somewhat simple, it does not seem all that well developed.  It is unknown how this society came into being, even though it is known how the Hunger Games began.      If this film were released last year, I would have hoped it would be nominated for best make-up.  Many of the characters look absolutely ridiculous and are way too flashy, but the make-up is v

First Man

Starring: Ryan Gosling, Claire Foy, Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler, and Corey Stoll Directed by: Damien Chazelle Screenplay by: Josh Singer Based on the book by James R. Hansen      Yes, this is the same director who did La La Land from a few years ago.  But this is a true story this time, and not necessarily a feel good one.      Many of us know about Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission in 1969.  First Man is not simply the story of the moon landing, but the story about Armstrong and what led him to be the first man in history to walk on the moon.  It's a story about making huge sacrifices for himself, and his family, in order to accomplish such a goal, as well as overcoming a great deal of grief.       The film focuses almost entirely on Neil (Ryan Gosling).  The film opens up on him as one of the premiere pilots in the military, piloting the X-15; a plane that was capable of flying over 100,000 feet altitude.  He is portrayed as

Resident Evil: Afterlife

Starring Milla Jovovich and Ali Larter, and directed by Paul W.S. Anderson Resident Evil: Afterlife is a somewhat scary action thriller about a zombie dominated planet during present times. It's the fourth movie in the franchise. Alice (Jovovich) is the former head of security at the Umbrella Corporation, the company that created the T-Virus that accidentally escaped and turned everybody into zombies. She travels to Alaska to what she thinks is a small town called Arcadia, where there is supposedly a colony of survivors that are infection free. She is drawn by transmissions saying that they offer safety and security, food and shelter. When she arrives, nothing is there, but she picks up Claire Redfield (Larter) and travels to what once was Los Angeles where there is another colony of four survivors living atop a prison rooftop and surrounded by zombies. They find that the Arcadia is actually a ship just offshore. Can they make it to the ship? Milla Jovovich plays a very act